%@ Page language="VB" %> <%@ Import Namespace="System.Data"%> <%@ Import Namespace="System.IO"%>
|
CPRW and off-shore wind turbines
- some thoughts by Geoff Sinclair. CPRW Consultant. |
After a hundred cases inland, offshore schemes
seemed to CPRW to present a release valve for the
pent-up forces of wind power. We evolved a policy
which, in a nutshell, inclines us to oppose land
based projects unless we can be persuaded
otherwise, but to take up an opposite position on
schemes out to sea. So, when faced with the first
two huge proposals off the N Wales coast at Rhyl
Flats and North Hoyle in 2001, we tentatively
ventured into the 'No Comment' zone. These 60
huge machines have now secured consent and will
make a significant contribution, representing
between them an annual output capability of
almost 0.7 terrawatt hours (TWh). That amount is
one-sixth of the Assembly's over-zealous target
for 20% of Wales' demand by 2010. It is also one
and a half times the total output from all 364 of
the landscape-damaging turbines which, despite
ten years of hard-fought opposition, now scar the
landscapes of Wales. 
But the uncomfortable truth is that, until their
scheduled completion later this year, no-one has
yet seen the reality of what may become a typical
sight 3 miles off some of our less-cherished
coasts. We await these marine giants with not a
little anxiety. If they are an acceptable
alternative we can stiffen our objections to
their land-based cousins even more: if they are
not, we will just have to dig in deeper and fend
off even more wrath from our environmentalist
'friends' of both the earth and the sea.
It was against this background that I found
myself preparing CPRW for my advice that we
should nevertheless oppose offshore project
number three, at Scarweather. Tantalisingly, it
would have taken marine wind power over the
psychologically important 1TWh barrier.
Opposition would also have given strength to our
arm in fighting the burgeoning onshore projects
in the Cinderella landscapes above the
south-Wales valleys, newly freed from the tyranny
of coal tips.
But this was not, as United Utilities might like
to think, simply a visual extension seawards of
the industrial landscape of Port Talbot. Thirty
turbines three times the height of those typical
in mid Wales would lie west of a cherished and
charming open coastline and flail against the
rays of the setting sun. It is just the place
that fixes your eyes whether you play golf, walk
the dog, laze about at Rest Bay, or wander down
to Kenfig Pool.
Or, ride the surf! When Merfyn and I arrived at
the SoS meeting at the 'Hi-Tide' we had a culture
shock. It was not the usual sprinkling of senior
citizens in the lounge of a genteel hotel. There
were some, but they had to be picked out from the
rolling sea of the young and fairly young, the
fit and the fairly fit, whose individual presence
at a typical CPRW gathering would have sparked a
frisson of excitement. What a sea change! If I
had any doubts before I knew we were right on the
night.
Full frontal impact on Porthcawl and Kenfig is
bad enough: peripheral damage to Gower and Exmoor
adds insult to injury. Lobbying of Councillors,
Assembly members has combined with populist
support to secure the first UK Public Inquiry
into an offshore project, or any above the 50MW
level given such derisory treatment by the Trade
and Industry system at Cefn Croes. A whole new
generation and a new community has now learned
the unpalatable and difficult truth that being
truly green is a painful business. This is the
unacceptable face of offshore wind power and we
look forward to joining them at the Public
Inquiry.